Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review sample reddit. Half a year thrown away.

Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review sample reddit Awaiting My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. 05. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again "Awaiting EIC decision" means that the journal is waiting on a decision by the "Editor in Chief". asked Dec 5, 2017 at 3:01. In ScholarOne this would be like having it set to require 2 reviews, then when the 2 reviews come in, changing it to require 3. Securing Research Funding. This depends a great deal on the particular journal. Link can be found on the FB Air Force writing and self improvement page. Still shows in the evidence, gathering review phase. In my case, I was fortunate to have made all 4 steps above in one day (I applied 2 days ago and skipped VJT), and I thank God for the blessings. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Often people decline invitations to review papers. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer I submitted in late june and the review process seems to have gone as they said it would. Check out the sidebar for intro guides. " Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. Diterima dengan Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. So, keep up your hope and wait for the status to change to "Under review. What does "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" mean? 1. This is basically a new service where you can see how many reviewers were invited, how many accepted the invitations, and how many have completed the review. What does this status mean? Thank you for your advice. I have previously published in the same journal Found regex match: approving the post It looks like you're asking about approving posts or users. At this point, each reviewer also writes up the text that will be communicated to the applicant. 1 Recommendation. My resume is still under review for Microsoft, 1 year after applying. 1. you will receive a direct email with the overall editorial decision, Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. This change has occurred The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. Since they said "final reviewer", they probably have at least one submitted peer review of your manuscript at this point. Publication Success. The Editor has made a . FOR INFO ON: # approving posts/users, # how to do it, # what it means, # why posts/comments are marked as spam (spam filter settings), # how to set all posts/comments to need mod approval, # shortcuts to approving posts/users, please click here. Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Skip to main content. Expand user menu Open settings menu. 17 Return for major revisions (65 review comments, quite intense, but the initial submission indeed had these issues); It has been a month since submission, and it has been "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" all Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. When I checked the link on the 16th of April, I saw that the status has changed from "Under Review" to "Review Complete" with the status date 16th of April with the following stats: The title says it all. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. While the first change was 25 days after the first change, since then, 6. reddit's new API changes kill third party apps that offer accessibility features, mod tools, and other features not found in the first party app. Could it change from Awaiting AE assignment to Under Review directly without AE being assigned ? peer-review; Share. The status was ‘Assigning to editors’ for three days and then ‘Under review’ for a month. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). Reply reply The Reddit Law School Admissions Forum. You can see that it spends no time here Under Review: 27 Feb 2017 till 9 Jun 2017; Reviews completed: 10 Jun 2017 till 22 Jun 2017; Editor assigned: and "editor assigned" is the default state when needing to get more reviews and no reviewer has actually been assigned. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is Reddit. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". I've had some rather frustrating encounters through the peer reviewed assignments, particularly for my Google Project Certificate in the final course, Capstone: Real World Scenarios. After passing the initial check, it stayed with the "Reviewers Assigned" status until 12 Oct and went Under Review on 13 Oct. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. For example- Lit review of the cellular entry mechanism of the Ebola virus- using all sources from only the last 5 years. Meaning of the "awaiting reviewer assignment" in journal status. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Fortunately, one of the colleagues received an email about the review and informed me that the deadline was October 30th, but I am worried that many reviewers will miss the review deadline because they have not received the email. " Does it mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? I was told that for paper with "minor revision," it is likely like it will not be sent back to the reviewers. Mine has under with DE for more than one Setting the Right Tone Part 1; Positive Phrases That Can Be Used in a Performance Review Part 2; How to Highlight an Employee’s Strengths with Specific Examples Part 3; Example Comments to Include to Provide Constructive Feedback Part 4; Structuring Your Comments Part 5; Using Examples in Comments Part 6; Encouraging Continuous Development Part 7; Avoiding The status changed from ‘Awaiting Editorial Office Processing’ to ‘Under Review’ about two months after submission. 15 days is nothing in academic time, especially with a global pandemic going on. , uploaded or physically delivered) and processed and is now being reviewed. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. I usually allocate time across 3 days. If the review reads like it could have been written about any other book, it is too vague. 06. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. 07. 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. It seems like 5 weeks is a very short time for it to be peer-reviewed, For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. It is just part of the way that resubmissions get routed through the GEMS system. NATHAN00 2022-08-15 It has been four months already, still under review. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. e. " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? I submitted to a Springer journal on August 5, and the status changed to Under Review on August 13. It sounds like it went to I'm in the pending final review phase as of today. What does this mean? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses My action center displayed “Application Submitted. Meanwhile, the editorial management system will be configured to automatically mark the paper as 'ready for After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I think you're right. My question is, what does change of status directly from On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Responding to Reviewer Comments; Journal Rejection; Journal Retraction; Career Growth. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Best guess: reviews came in after all this time but were inconclusive, and "editor assigned" is the default state when needing to get more reviews and no reviewer has actually been assigned. Article title. It’s month seven and currently it’s at Co-EIC after first revision. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers I think @ShakeBaby might have nailed it in the "whatever" comment. 4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist f914. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Therefore, new reviewers are being invited. I come back and I've been on awaiting assignment since the new year started but still there doesn't seem to have been a place for me to be placed. This may be hard, but some of my guys have done a really good job of it this year. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. When I was a new grad a year ago, about half the companies that rejected me did so a week after I applied. MSgt is a go getter followed by a generic statement about awards. pa. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. However, I just noticed that the status of my EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, 2023/07 A revision has been submitted, under review for approximately one week after submission. I find it strange that reviewers have Some examples I sawstarted off by saying MSgt Snuffy was worth his weight in gold. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now my paper went from "under review" to awaiting EIC decision after about 5 and a half weeks. – Parnian. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. Or, I submitted my manuscript to a journal from 1 month ago in scholar one. The resumes have been shared with the hiring panel for a review before they can start contacting candidates. Some editorial systems give the status as with editors, Why would manuscript status change from "awaiting reviewer decisions" to "evaluation requests sent to reviewers"? Ask Question Asked 8 years, 9 months ago. It makes an impression and stands out from others. ) You should cite it in accordance with the citation standards in your field. The best place on Reddit for admissions advice. The status changed to admin check to under review after one week. Relatedly, does under review mean that the AE has sent to referees or just that AE has been assigned? 4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 2460. 01 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. 3. My manager also told me that everyone on awaiting assignment needs to make a mandatory come back to the office and that's when I The main status says under review. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. I downvoted this answer because by far the most time Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Reviewer 2 hates me and I‘m sure I won’t be able to change his mind. However, the Under Review status changed to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 17 and again to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 19. Researchers have 21 days to approve submissions. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. This is sometimes done by junior scholars, but looks odd for senior scholars, at least in many fields. Yes, it is fine and normal to cite articles that are under review as an applicant, a graduate student, and an early career researcher. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. If an editor wants, say, two reviews for a paper, they may initially invite four or five referees. After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. Most recent answer. Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. For real peer review the grammatical and structural stuff are usually already handled, but if not then it gets a comment. 2. An example: "Migrated company blog hosting from locally hosted to Microsoft Azure after consulting with Marketing and IT Director about company's Q2 and Q3 2015 online marketing goals. If you are auto-admit, it will take longer to review transcript in order to confirm rank. I am confused since the current status was already passed before the editors sent the manuscript out for review. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. The paper status is still "awaiting My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. I know it's typically a bad sign if the reviews as a whole take only a short time (for example, the paper has the "under review" status only for a few days). Or check it out in the app stores   EPB Higher Level Reviewer Assessments/E7s and E8s . zengyue 2023-01-14 2022. 245 5 5 silver badges 11 11 bronze badges. Funding Sources; Grant Application; Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal Hi. Half a year thrown away. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. As you've mentioned, you have addressed the previous reviewer's concerns, so the EIC may suggest moving the manuscript to peer-review based on what you have addressed. Your reviewers will read your paper or case Editor assignment pending after "review competed" Ask Question Asked 9 years, 6 months ago. (I have a book under review right now that I sent out in September and still only have one of the three reviewer's reports back. The product is still available. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without 2023. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". E. A book review should read like it could only be written about that book. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. First time submitting there. Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. ED1 said major, ED2 said minor. Under review: The Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. In ScholarOne this would be like having it set to require 2 reviews, then when the 2 reviews come in, changing it to require 3. Same experience here. So the status change from under review to reviewer assigned. I have the review submitted page so I know that I hit submit. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. More importantly What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer assignment" to "Reviewers Invited" mean? What does a status change from "Required reviews completed" back to "Under review" mean? Additionally, you may also find it worthwhile to invest in this handbook: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. Research Culture; Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Does it really mean that my application is under review? I’m looking for some answers as I’m really confused cause it’s been over 1 months. The other half still have me under review, over a year later. The other Journal is back after first review. I've found it's usually the big companies that keep me under review forever instead of rejecting me. Revise. This refers to the internal check by the journal, for basic aspects such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, scope match, and adherence to the journal The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a . Funding Sources; Grant Application; Science Communication. Why is it being reviewed? Well, we need to make sure that you didn't just upload a blank PDF and claim it was your transcript / expanded résumé / etc. 27 Submit the paper; 2022. This change has occurred Unfortunately the escalation method of local politicians don't really go anywhere in PA. Applications still saying under review after over a month since applying Practice compassion (for The title says it all. And I thought I could get close to wrapping up journals and dissertation. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was different. I submitted it toward the end of May, and recently it’s changed from saying “under peer review” to “awaiting reviewer scores. PD is only 1 month earlier than RD, and for those who end up getting CAP they receive CAP decision the same as PD like end of Jan or beginning of Feb. g. 01 Under review 2023. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have system status to indicate this). 30 Reject (Resubmission Allowed) 2023. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? 10/18/2022: Under Review & Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10/27/2022: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 01/10/2023: Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation 01/17/2023: Awaiting Editor-in-Chief Decision 01/23/2023: Minor Revision 02/16/2023: Under Review & Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 02/25/2023: Awaiting Editor-in-Chief Decision 03/03/2023: Accept kaito Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets; Cringe & Facepalm; Funny; Interesting; Memes; my paper went from "under review" to awaiting EIC decision after about 5 and a half weeks. (At some point, you have enough stuff that this is not really needed. By virtue of submitting to another journal, the authors are under the assumption of a clean slate. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. Our interpretation: The item has been received (i. This Stage 3: Peer review. Ditolak 2. Modified 8 years, to review, but don't submit their reports by the deadline (or tell the editor that they won't be able to complete the review after all. This change has occurred Each reviewer is normally allowed 28 days to submit his or her report, but may occasionally be allowed longer. I wouldn't worry just yet. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. May I ask if this is normal? How long have I to wait before formally asking the editor about the status of my submission? How to react to this editor response after a long fruitless review phase? 2. Modified 9 years, 3 months ago. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Could not find answer at above link. Mental Health in Academia. After round 2, ED1 said OK, ED2 said reject. It is also not on the Reviewed list. This procedure removes some of the variability associated with reviewer scoring. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Day 1. I submitted my manuscript to a journal. What we think it should say: Processed; Under Review Some set up automatic approval so it is approved as soon as you submit the study. This last course contains 8 different peer review assignments, and my goodness, passing through them has sometimes been like climbing the rocky face of a mountain. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. These are frequently-asked questions. As a co-author, i saw recently that our paper switched from status. 2022/06/12 Under review 2022/06/13 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2011/06/28 No updates. CSCareerQuestions protests in solidarity with the developers who made third party reddit apps. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. If you hover over the "Awaiting Review" you will see the date the study is to be approved by. A couple of months for the whole process (finding reviewers, review, editor decision) is quite Hence, "Qualifications Under Review" basically means your application didn't score high but not low enough and is put on a backup in case they need to fill spots. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Zhang Jie. Na yo, you're good. Follow edited Dec 5, 2017 at 4:11. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". Lit review- literally a review of the literature published on that specific topic/field- usually within a set time frame- IE like the within the last 5 years etc. ” I submitted a manuscript to a medical science journal. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. But today suddenly the status changed back to These are relatively simple. 摸鱼ing? 2022-06-27 This D journal is like this, insisting on self-destruction. As can be inferred from Fig. There is a teams page dedicated to writing and reviewing other award packages and EPBs. The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Log In/Register. Once scores have been assigned by 3 reviewers per applicant, applicants are then selected for further discussion at a review panel (in this case, a virtual panel). 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023 Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. Therefore, I may suggest experts of the field to help the process, if you are still seeking reviewers. Then it said “Awaiting Recommendation” for 2 weeks, and now as of a week and half it says “Awaiting Decision”. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. Tie your accomplishments to bigger things that the company has accomplished. I called and they told me that it is pending final review, they asked for After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Under Review: This status means that the manuscript is under peer review. It seems like 5 weeks is a very short time for it to be peer-reviewed, but almost 6 weeks under review seems like a long time for them to just desk reject it. ***** NOTE: Automod nukes content from new accounts and those below a certain karma number. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I feel Hi. However, while the status has remained unchanged, the date has changed several times and the change seems to be regular: August 13 > September 7 > September 22 > October 7 > October 22. Read paper and note down any issues that come to mind (2-4 h because I struggle to focus). The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. I have Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review that made the editor think another review is required. Others take their time. As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. Or check it out in the app stores if it's under review. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Skip to main content Ask a Question. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". The system will continue to show "Awaiting reviewer scores" until all reviewers have submitted their reports. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection Author and Peer Reviewer Support; Submission; Enter your search term here Search Editorial process after submission Modified on: Wed, 20 Nov, 2024 at 9:08 AM. If you only have to change 5-10 words in the review to make it about any other A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. I have submitted to a journal where "editor assignment pending" meant assignment of reviewers by the editor was pending, not that the assignment of an editor at all was pending. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. I know for duplicate/similar items from a seller that you may not be able to submit an 'Awaiting' review or it may not be approved once categorized under the 'Reviewed' tab. 28 Resubmitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing 2023. What does awaiting reviewer assignment mean under review? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. If you are holistic, you can ignore that as they won't spend too much effort reviewing it. In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. It sounded like their "under review" meant Manuscript under review for more than 15 months, what to do? My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. Please note that I have a time restriction for getting an official review. I've been under review after completing a loop two weeks ago. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Role of the reviewer. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. The editor in chief may not just 'accept' or 'reject' the manuscript. for APA: Mango, I. the team is reviewing all the applications received for the role. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Responding to Reviewer Comments; Journal Rejection; Journal Retraction; Career Growth. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. Editor Assigned Pending to I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. 5. Viewed 15k times In another example, I would complain if my paper is still not under review after one month, but it’s fine if it is under review at that time. Does this mean that the paper has passed the editorial check and the external reviewer completed? First of all, the third line up from the bottom, “Waiting for Reviewer Assignment,” really shouldn’t be there. Reply reply TheBrain85 • It's probably useful to point out that I was referring to the time given to a reviewer, once assigned. I've written three reviews for random 'Awaiting' orders having made no prior purchases of those products or dupes, but the reviews aren't shifting to 'Reviewed'. Hope you all are having better luck! I reviewed an item via the Vine Awaiting Review link, hit submit and 3 hours later it is not on the AW list. There is a thing now called open peer review where the review comments and responses are published with the well I'm not sure. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Journal Name. Also, the reviewer guidelines have not been updated yet as below. Early december applicant status Since it is passed [duration] months after the expected response time, I would like to ask the status of my paper, which is currently under review. They don't have a direct line to the UI dept and more or less send the same email you do asking about status, the difference being their email has a . After 22 days, the submission is automatically approved. Very important: then i sleep on it to let the paper sit in my mind and see what the main goals, objectives, and takeaways are. A very painful situation for After my first missions ended which were already expiring because I was hired a little before they were, it took about 2/3 days to get more. From the reviewer side, you should absolutely not be reviewing papers you are familiar with - it violates the spirit of "blind" reviews. I am afraid we are likely in the bad news in 6-9 month group unfortunately. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same day it changed back to "Under Review". "Thank you for your contribution to AAAI 2021. If it’s not going through I don’t know what to do. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. The status of the paper changed several times. 04. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Cite. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. Please note that other statuses may Mine is awaiting reviewer scores after a couple weeks now. All the best for the next update! While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review, because the status changed so quickly after submission, this probably refers to the internal review, which is about aspects such as a match with the journal’s scope, the quality of the writing/presentation, and the research at a basic level. Awaiting Editor Decision. now it has a new status "awaiting reviewer selection" Please I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Now, it has changed to ‘Assigning for Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). However, the status changed to ‘Assigning for review’ for about a week and then changed to ‘Under review’ again, this time for about a week. Mega Nav. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). Thank you for your interest! You’ve successfully applied to this position and we’re reviewing your application”. Members Online. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. The timeline went from Editor invited (is editor a subject or a direct object?) on September 2 to reviews received (not reviewers received) on September 12 (see pic here). Quality journals are going to attach the reviewers' comments to the Under Review. Took about 2 weeks to assign reviewers, then it was “Under Review” for about 9 weeks. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted my manuscript on Oct 5 in a Springer Psychology journal. The main issue is to make sure these papers are not listed with peer-reviewed publications, which looks like CV padding. 19 Awaiting Decision 2023. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control and added value to you in the form of constructive feedback. Under Review. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. Meaning of Under Review status for Taylor & Francis journals Becoming a Peer Reviewer; Career Advice for researchers; Mental Health. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. Ours is not listed there currently, but I did a Google search with "Proposal Review Panel for Translational Impacts (84683)" in quotes + the name of our PD and saw that the PD led a review on August 31, 2023. San San. and I'd recommend taking time to go over notes/review thoroughly before taking the exam. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. And it can definitely take 20 days to find three people willing to review a paper. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. (under review). No word from recruiter, just stuck in under review limbo. We've not-so-recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS, which, after passing quality checks, has remained at the 'Under Editorial Board Review' stage for 33 days now. 28 Submitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing 2023. San. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Post any questions you have, there are lots of redditors with admissions knowledge waiting to help. ) As the person I've responded to admits, they essentially copied pasted their prior review at the other journal. Not sure what the difference is. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". The latter happened to me once as a guest editor. It will also I volve critiques of methods or other ideas the reviewer think should he covered. 08. When I asked about my status, the editorial manager said that the handling editor is still assessing whether they would send my manuscript for review. A subreddit for students, staff and all things related to the University of Edinburgh. I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". My understanding is that the editor has made the decision based on the reviews, but they have now passed the decision to the editor-in-chief. Log In / Sign Up; Advertise on Reddit; Shop Collectible Avatars; Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. What does this mean? Please help. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" For example, the editor or the editor's Usually, when the profile is under review, it means that. Improve this question. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of In fact, it means that the journal has performed an initial review of your submission, and after finding that it works at a basic level (scope match, adherence to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. But from the Elsevier's tracking feature, I noticed one reviewer finished their review within 2 days of accepting the invitation. Did anyone encounter the same Bear in mind that all academics have just had to pivot all their teaching from in-person to online, are scrambling to prepare for a very strange and unpredictable new academic year, have had to help their senior / research students reconfigure their projects and, if they’re very lucky, are taking a couple of weeks of summer vacation. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. Talk to your SM, and make a Face to Face appointment with the SM you are looking to work for. Commented Jun 26, you'll find people whose papers have been under review for more than a year. About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. Now, it shows Awaiting Decision. But my question is as below. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? But, now it is showing Awaiting Review. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. ) Then the editor tries to find additional reviewers. Hello all! I’m currently submitting my first first author paper and so I keep obsessively checking the status of my submitted manuscript. A colleague of ours had submitted an article two days prior and received a desk rejection about two weeks ago. I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. You can list them separately in an "under review" section. Under review in my recent experience means your MHR is discussing candidates with their current SM’s to figure out which ones to move into the interview slots. 03. Thanks. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Recommend everyone join it. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. gov handle at the end of it. Question What are you all inputting for the HLR makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). I thought this meant the external review. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Doesn't show on the va app, but noticed it says updated march 14th, today. Academic Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. In my field(s) one often waits 3-6 month from submission to get a real response to a submission, due largely to the slow review process. glotl ukxkve rtfef stuau ufxx ozs tsdlw pvvsz ecd qgmdgn